Olej podle normy VW 505.01 - má interval výměny 15.000 km nebo jeden rok Olej podle normy VW 506.01 - má interval výměny 30.-50.000 km nebo 2
roky - je určen pro vozidla s WIV (prodloužený interval údržby)
Passat 1.9 TDI PD (AVB - 74kW QG1) (DT) (2000)
Servisní interval QG1 = pružný servisní interval (dlouhodobý).
Servisní
interval QG0/2 = interval závisí na času/vzdálenosti (nepružný)
Pokud podle QG1 nebo QG2 (kruhové honování) potom lze použít olej 505 i 506
pokud dle QG0 (křížové honování) potom lze použít pouze olej 505.
Pozor na skokovou změnu kvality oleje - může poškodit motor.
ACEA:C3, A3/B4, long life, motory Euro 4 a 5 s DPF pro koncern VW:VW
504.00/507.00, 506.01, MB 229.51, 229.31,BMW LL-04, Porsche C30Plně
syntetický motorový olej prvotřídní kvality
SynPower XL-III C3 Motor Oil
SAE stupeň viskozity 5W-30
Viskozita, mm2 /s při 100 ºC. ASTM D-445 11.9
Viskozita, mm2 /s při 40 ºC. ASTM D-445 68
Viskozitní Index ASTM D-2270 173
Viskozita, mPa.s při -30 ºC. ASTM D-5293 <6400 p="">
TBN, mg KOH/g ASTM D-2896 6.2
Bod tuhnutí, ºC ASTM D-5949 -48
Měrná hustota při 15.6°C. ASTM D-4052 0.852
Bod vzplanutí, COC, ºC. ASTM D-92 214
More than 90% of new Euro 6 diesels on sale today that don’t meet the EU emission limits on the road are still exempt from low emission zones (LEZs) or diesel bans in European cities, a new briefing by Transport & Environment (T&E) reveals. These Euro 6 diesels still exceed the nitrogen oxides (NOx) limit by 4 to 5 times while some models up to 10 times higher, notably Renault, Fiat and Opel models. Some Euro 6 vehicles emit more NOx on the road than Euro 4 and 5 cars that are banned...
o 76% jiná spotřeba než deklarovaná! Toyota Prius viz níže
Aktuální testy německých úřadů ukázaly, že dieselové vozy splňující nejvyšší normu Euro 6 vyprodukují ve skutečném provozu 507 miligramů oxidů dusíku na kilometr, norma přitom počítá s emisemi maximálně 80 miligramů na kilometr. Podle současných právních předpisů nemusejí auta normy dodržovat ve skutečném provozu, ale jen při měření v laboratoři ... !
Lžeme si jaká máme v EU green auta!
Máme je ale pouze (asi) v laboratořích! Ne! Nerozhoduje spotřeba, životnost, užitné vlastnosti ... ale kolik si nalžeme, že vypouští emisí!
Rozhoduje jaké green etikety na auto nalepíme!
...the IPCC itself closes off any possibility of resolving the climate
problem. It is indispensable to reject capitalist “realism” — this
insane profit drive — if we are to find a way to limit the catastrophe
and prevent it from becoming cataclysmic.
The main difficulty is not technical but social, and therefore
political: the necessary alternative cannot be organized from above. It
requires imperatively a powerful mobilization at the base, a generalized
responsibility. Let’s dare to say it: we need a global self-management
revolution to democratically address, at all levels, the combined social
and environmental crises...
... We think we must first tell the truth. Our anticapitalist alternative
leaves you wanting more? That is normal, it could not be otherwise.
Together, we need to transform your hunger into an appetite for
something else, to generate the idea of a society that produces less and
shares more, for real needs, in respect for humans and non-humans, a
society that appeals to the imagination. That is the function of the
13-point draft program outlined above. It is necessary to fight both the
anxiety-inducing defeatist discourse and the pseudo-realistic discourse
propagating the illusion that the optimum scenario (the IPCC’s Scenario
1) could be realized — or at least approached — by following a less
radical path.
In the United States, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez proposes a “Green New
Deal.” In Europe, Jean Jouzel and Pierre Larrouturou plead for a
“climate finance plan.” There are now more and more such proposals for
less radical paths. The lines are moving, and that is undeniably a
positive effect of the social movement. However, if we examine them in
detail, we find that these proposals have three points in common:
they bypass the key question of the indispensable reduction in energy consumption, material production and transport;
they do not exclude the use of negative emission technologies such
as BECCS, or so-called “miracle technologies” such as hydrogen;
most often, they refrain from taking a clear stand for compliance
with the commitments toward the South, against the purchase of emission
credits and carbon offsets, etc. ...
communist / socialist lies
Lži
Lies
Eko-Mafie
Eko-terror
Green lies
Ekoterrorist
Ekoterorista Ecosocialist
Zelená Ideologie
Green ideologies Eco national socialist Green national socialist
